Guardians of Professional Integrity: Preserving the Integrity of Psychological Testing

Call to Action to Promote Ethical Psychological Testing

11/21/20232 min read

Image Source: https://medium.com/psyc-406-2015/ethical-issues-of-psychological-testing-in-school-c5cd19408dfc

In the dynamic landscape of psychological testing, where the intricate interplay of insights guides diagnoses, screenings, and crucial decisions, it is imperative to weave together the ethical fabric outlined in both RA 9258, the Guidance and Counseling Act of 2004, and RA 10029, the Philippine Psychology Act of 2009. As we navigate the junction of these pivotal legislations, our focus sharpens on ethical practices, urging a preference for companies that uphold the highest standards in psychological testing.

The Legal Tapestry: Integrating RA 9258 and RA 10029

Republic Act 9258, enacted in 2004, marked a milestone in the professionalization of guidance and counseling in the Philippines. Under this legislation, the scope of psychological testing expanded, embracing licensed guidance counselors alongside psychologists and psychometrician in RA 10029 of 2009 setting the stage for the ethical administration and interpretation of psychological tests.

Ethics at the Core: Safeguarding Psychological Tests

The Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines designates psychological tests as intellectual property, a common ethical ground between RA 9258 and RA 10029. The legal landscape underscores the author's exclusive rights to reproduce and modify these invaluable works. Emily Campbell's legal insights emphasize that psychological tests are indeed "original works of authorship," further reinforcing the need for ethical conduct in their utilization.

Ethical companies, echoing the principles outlined in both Acts, play a pivotal role in preserving the integrity of psychological testing. PAR Inc. and Pearson, stalwarts of the industry responsible for tests like Stanford-Binet and MCMI-IV, exemplify this commitment. Their unwavering stance against unauthorized copying aligns seamlessly with the ethical standards advocated by the Philippine Guidance and Counseling Association and the Psychological Association of the Philippines, emphasizing the exclusive handling of test materials by qualified professionals.

Championing Ethics: A Call to the Community

In the pursuit of ethical excellence, we urge professionals, companies, and institutions to prioritize ethical practices in psychological testing. The harmonious integration of RA 9258 and RA 10029 serves as a beacon, guiding us toward a future where ethical considerations are at the forefront of every assessment.

Choosing ethical companies for psychological tests becomes not just a preference but a responsibility. These companies not only comply with legal frameworks but also contribute to the greater ethical fabric of the profession. In the realms of HR, education, healthcare, and government, the choice of ethical testing practices aligns with the broader vision of a conscientious and principled community. Let us collectively champion ethics, and let our preference be a resounding endorsement for companies that uphold the sanctity of psychological tests.

References:

Go, J.(2017,June 16).Discussion.[Filipino Psychometricians].Facebook.Retrieved November 18, 2023, from https://web.facebook.com/groups/filipinopsychometricians/posts/1532252953493241/?_rdc=1&_rdr

Professional Regulation Commission.(2007, August).IRR of RA 9258. https://www.prc.gov.ph › PRBguidance2007-02